Yes, that was the big revelation to me when I was in graduate school—when I finally understood that the half page of code on the bottom of page 13 of the Lisp 1.5 manual was Lisp in itself. These were “Maxwell’s Equations of Software!”
This quote appears many places on the web, but the code itself is harder to find. What is this amazing half page of code?
The Lisp 1.5 Manual, which was written by John McCarthy et al in 1961, is available at softwarepreservation.org. In it, the "Maxwell's equations" define a universal Lisp function evalquote
that can evaluate any given function:
evalquote[fn;x] = apply[fn;x;NIL]where
apply[fn;x;a] = [atom[fn] -> [eq[fn;CAR] -> caar[x]; eq[fn;CDR] -> cdar[x]; eq[fn;CONS] -> cons[car[x];cadr[x]]; eq[fn;ATOM] -> atom[car[x]]; eq[fn;EQ] -> eq[car[x];cadr[x]]; T -> apply[eval[fn;a];x;a]]; eq[car[fn];LAMBDA] -> eval[caddr[fn];pairlis[cadr[fn];x;a]]; eq[car[fn];LABEL] -> apply[caddr[fn];x;cons[cons[cadr[fn]; caddr[fn]];a]]] eval[e;a] = [atom[e] -> cdr[assoc[e;a]]; atom[car[e]] -> [eq[car[e],QUOTE] -> cadr[e]; eq[car[e];COND] -> evcon[cdr[e];a]; T -> apply[car[e];evlis[cdr[e];a];a]]; T -> apply[car[e];evlis[cdr[e];a];a]] evcon[c;a] = [eval[caar[c];a] -> eval[cadar[c];a]; T -> evcon[cdr[c];a]] evlis[m;a] = [null[m] -> NIL; T -> cons[eval[car[m];a];evlis[cdr[m];a]]]
The above code is defined in a meta-language (M-expressions), which can be straighforwardly translated into S-expressions. Functions in M-expressions use square brackets and have arguments separated by semicolons. M-expressions conditionals are of the form [predicate -> value; predicate -> value; ...]
. M-expression label
is analogous to defun
or define
.
The point of all this is that M-expressions are the code that operates on the S-expression data, but the M-expression meta-language and S-expression data actually coincide. Thus, code and data are the same thing in Lisp, and a half-page of code is sufficient to define a basic Lisp interpreter in Lisp given a few primitives (car, cdr, cons, eq, atom
). The code presents a Meta-circular evaluator for Lisp; see (SICP chapter 4.1 for more details on metacircular evaluators. (Unfortunately, this won't give you a working Lisp interpreter for free; things such as the garbage collector, the list primitives, and parsing need to be implemented somewhere. Also note that this metacircular evaluator doesn't give you niceties such as arithmetic.))
To understand the above code, apply
takes a function and argument, while eval
acts on a form. The last argument to these is an association list for the environment, which stores the values of bound values and function names. In brief, apply
implements CAR
, CDR
, CONS
, ATOM
, and EQ
in terms of the primitives. It implements LAMBDA
by pairing up the variables and arguments and passing them to eval
. It implements LABEL
(which defines a function) by adding the function name and definition to the association list.
The code for eval
processes a form in a straightforward manner. It handles the QUOTE
form by returning the quoted value. It handles COND
by evaluating the predicates with the help of evcon
. Otherwise, it interprets an atom as a variable and returns the value. If given a list, it interprets this as a function application; the arguments are evaluated with evalis
and the function is evaluated by apply
.
The above code is not quite complete; it relies on some other simple functions that were previously defined in the manual, such as equals
and cadr
Less obvious functions are pairlis[x;y;a]
pairs up lists x
and y
and adds them to association list a
. assoc[x;a]
looks up x
in association list a
. sublis[a;y]
treats association list a
as a mapping of variables to values, and replaces variables in S-expression y
with the associated variables. These functions can be straightforwardly built from the primitive functions.
(By the way, I'm pretty sure the comma in eq[car[e],QUOTE]
is a typo, but that's how it is in the original.)
4 comments:
Early eval definitions were like doomed, all had bugs. Definition of McCarthy's Lisp in McCarthy's Lisp can be of interest.
Thank you for your post; since you care about typos while copying the code from the original book, be aware of your own typo in the part of the code for the "apply" function where "parlis" should be written "pairlis"; Regards.
Thanks, Anonymous. I've fixed the typo,
Post a Comment